Allergy Consumer Review - Product Reviews, Advice, Solutions
   
 
 

Effects of Second Hand Smoke

A fact sheet on second hand smoke

by www.no-smoke.org

January 2004

This document may only be re-used with appropriate credit to Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights.

The Science Of Secondhand Smoke (Shs)


INFO LINKS
  • Air Purifiers Overview - view all air purifiers sold by AllergyBuyersClub.com
  • Air Purifiers Comparison Chart - a comparison with pluses and minuses of all the best air purifiers
  • Pollen and Hayfever Solution Guide - a quick buyers guide of the best recommended products to solve airborne allergen problems
  • Best Air Purifier Articles - Editor's top picks on air purifier info
    • The 1999 National Cancer Institute Monograph 10, based on the 1997 Cal-EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) review of population-based studies, confirmed that SHS is fatal and has numerous non-fatal health effects. SHS chemicals include irritants and systemic toxicants, mutagens, and carcinogens, and reproductive and developmental toxicants. More than 50 compounds in tobacco smoke are known carcinogens. SHS exposure causes lung and nasal sinus cancer, heart disease, and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. Serious impacts of SHS on children include asthma induction and exacerbation, bronchitis and pneumonia, middle ear infection, chronic respiratory symptoms, and low birth weight. (National Cancer Institute, "Health effects of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke: the report of the California Environmental Protection Agency." Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph 10, 1999. Downloaded on November 25, 2003; and, California Environmental Protection Agency, "Health Effects of Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke," 1997)
       
    • SHS is the third leading cause of preventable death in this country, killing 53,000 nonsmokers in the U.S. each year. For every eight smokers the tobacco industry kills, it takes one nonsmoker with them. (Glantz, S.A. & Parmley, W., "Passive Smoking and Heart Disease: Epidemiology, Physiology, and Biochemistry," Circulation, 1991; 83(1): 1-12; and, Taylor, A., Johnson, D. & Kazemi, H., "Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Cardiovascular Disease," Circulation, 1992; 86: 699-702)
       
    • The 1986 Report of the Surgeon General; the 1986 National Research Council report, Environmental Tobacco Smoke: Measuring Exposures and Assessing Health Effects; and the 1992 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency report, Respiratory Health Effects of Passive Smoking: Lung Cancer and Other Disorders, established that SHS exposure causes lung cancer. (National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, "1986 Surgeon General Report: The Health Consequences of Involuntary Smoking," 1986. Downloaded on November 25, 2003; and, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Respiratory Health Effects of Passive Smoking: Lung Cancer and Other Disorders," 1992. Downloaded on November 25, 2003)
       
    • The 2002 Environmental Health Information Service's 10th Report on Carcinogens classifies SHS as a Group A (Human) Carcinogen - a substance known to cause cancer in humans. There is no safe level of exposure for Group A toxins. In addition, the 2002 World Health Organization International Agency's (IARC) Monograph on Tobacco Smoking, both Active and Passive concluded that nonsmokers are exposed to the same carcinogens as active smokers. (Report on Carcinogens, Tenth Edition; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program, December 2002. Downloaded on November 25, 2003; and, International Agency for Research on Cancer Monograph's Program, "Monograph on Tobacco Smoking, both Active and Passive," World Health Organization, June 2002. Downloaded on November 25, 2003)
       
    • Even a half hour of secondhand smoke exposure causes heart damage similar to that of habitual smokers. Nonsmokers' heart arteries showed a reduced ability to dilate, diminishing the ability of the heart to get life-giving blood. In addition, the same half hour of secondhand smoke exposure activates blood platelets, which can initiate the process of atherosclerosis (blockage of the heart's arteries) that leads to heart attacks. These effects explain other research showing that nonsmokers regularly exposed to SHS suffer death or morbidity rates 30% higher than those of unexposed nonsmokers. (Otsuka, R., et al. "Acute Effects of Passive Smoking on the Coronary Circulation in Healthy Young Adults," Journal of the American Medical Association, 286: 436-441, 2001; and, Burghuber, O., et al. "Platelet sensitivity to prostacyclin in smokers and non-smokers," Chest, 90: 34-38, 1986. Downloaded on November 25, 2003)
       
    • Restaurant workers are exposed to levels of secondhand smoke that are approximately 1.6 to 2.0 times higher than those to which office workers are exposed on the job. Workers in the "5 B's"(bars, bowling alleys, billiard halls, betting establishments, and bingo parlors) have SHS exposure levels that are 2.4 to 18.5 times higher than those in offices, and 1.5 to 11.7 times higher than in restaurants - a risk level 47 times higher than the federal government's defined level for a carcinogen. (Siegel, M. "Involuntary Smoking in Restaurant Workplace: A Review of Employee Exposure and Health Effects." Journal of the American Medical Association, 270:490-493, 1993. Downloaded on November 25, 2003; and, Siegel, M. " Exposure to secondhand smoke and excess lung cancer mortality risk among workers in the '5 B's': bars, bowling alleys, billiard halls, betting establishments, and bingo parlours." Tobacco Control, 12:333-338, 2003. Available at: Downloaded on November 25, 2003)
    • In 1991, data showed that nearly 90 percent of the U.S. population had measurable levels of serum cotinine (metabolized nicotine) in their blood. In 2002, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals found more than a 75 percent decrease in median cotinine levels for nonsmokers in the U.S. since 1991- an indication that smoke-free environments significantly reduce exposure to SHS. (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Department of Health and Human Services, "Second National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals," National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH Pub. No. 02-0716) January 2003; and, Centers for Disease Control; Department of Health and Human Services, "Facts about Secondhand Smoke," Updated: September 2003)

    Tobacco Industry Attacks On The Science Of Secondhand Smoke

    • In 1981, the Tobacco Institute spent more than $100 million in "smoking-health research" campaigns to increase tobacco industry credibility and restore a reasonable doubt that SHS exposure is harmful. (Kornegay, H., "New Directions Implementation," Tobacco Institute, Bates No. CORTI003963-3970: 1981)
       
    • In 1987, Philip Morris admitted, "We will never find an unbiased scientist who concludes that ETS [environmental tobacco smoke] exposure has been proven safe for non-smokers."("The ETS Issue: Science and Politics," Philip Morris, Bates No. 2023551401-1404: 1987)
       
    • A Philip Morris memo, written four days after the EPA announced the release of the final version of its 1992 landmark report finding that SHS is a carcinogen, outlined the tobacco industry's planned response: "Our overriding objective is to discredit the EPA report…" Tobacco manufacturers filed suit against the EPA in 1993. ("NCI Supports EPA's Conclusions that Secondhand Smoke is Dangerous," News Release, National Cancer Institute, May 4, 1993; "The Czarina's Edict," Memorandum from Ellen Merlo, January 11, 1993, Bates No. 2023920140)
       
    • Other internal documents made public as a result of a lawsuit against the tobacco industry show how researchers were used to undermine the EPA report. The Tobacco Institute and two law firms managed a project, which paid 13 scientists more than $156,000 to write letters to influential publications criticizing the report. Lawyers edited, and in some instances wrote, the scientists' letters. (Hanners, D. "Scientists Were Paid to Write Letters: Tobacco Industry Sought to Discredit EPA Report," Pioneer Planet, August 4, 1998)
       
    • In March 1998, British American Tobacco Company attempted to discredit a World Health Organization study on the effects of SHS in seven European countries, claiming that the agency suppressed the study because of negative findings. In reality, the paper summarizing the study was undergoing scientific peer review prior to publication, and its findings-consistent with other major scientific reviews-showed a statistically significant increased risk of lung cancer among nonsmoking spouses of smokers. ("Passive Smoking Does Cause Lung Cancer, Do Not Let Them Fool You," Press Release, World Health Organization, March 9, 1998)
       
    • In July 1998, in a lawsuit filed by a number of tobacco manufacturers against the EPA, U.S. District Judge William Osteen-a former tobacco industry lobbyist-ruled parts of the EPA report invalid. The EPA filed an appeal in September 1998 and stood by its conclusions on the health effects of SHS, which have been validated by a number of more recent and more comprehensive studies. In December 2002, a three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals threw out the lawsuit against the EPA. The judges ruled that tobacco companies cannot sue the EPA over its secondhand smoke report, because the report was not a final agency action and hence not subject to court review. (Schlesinger, J.M., "Secondhand-Smoke Study Ruled Invalid: Federal Judge Says EPA Overstated Cancer Link; Agency Likely to Appeal," Wall Street Journal, July 20, 1998; "Respiratory Health Effects of Passive Smoking," U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation, last modified on June 6, 2000; and, [n.a.], "Suit on Secondhand Smoke Dismissed," Washington Post: A16, December 12, 2002)
       
    • After decades of attacking credible science proving SHS's adverse health effects, Philip Morris's website now states, "Public health officials have concluded that secondhand smoke from cigarettes causes disease, including lung cancer and heart disease, in non-smoking adults…. [Philip Morris] also believe that the conclusions of public health officials concerning environmental tobacco smoke are sufficient to warrant measurers that regulate smoking in public places." (Philip Morris, "Health Issues: Secondhand Smoke," Downloaded: January 9, 2004)

    First Published: March 2004
    Updated: February 2007

    Send this article to a friend

    .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. ..................................................

     

     

     

    Home • Community Forum • ArchivesFREE SubscriptionAllergy ReliefProduct Comparisons
      Index • About UsContact Us  • Disclaimer
    Sitemap 

    © 2009 Allergy Consumer Review